2017 came exactly one second late.

Last night, the international timekeeping community tacked an additional second, known as a leap second, on to the last minute of 2016.

As midnight approached, the official atomic clocks that keep Universal Coordinated Time marked the time as 23h 59m 59s, followed by the leap second 23h 59m 60s. Jan. 1 continued as usual, beginning with 0h 0m 0s.

Unlike leap years, leap seconds are not a regular occurrence. Instead, they are decreed by the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service, or IERS, in Paris, which measures Earth’s rotation and compares it with the time kept by atomic clocks.

You may not realize it, but modern society is governed by two types of time.

The first, astronomical time, is based on how long it takes Earth to make one complete spin on its axis. Through most of human history, this type of time was measured by the rising and setting of the sun. Today, however, scientists keep track of it by aiming a network of radio telescopes at a distant quasar.

Atomic time, on the other hand, defines a second as exactly 9,192,631,770 oscillations of a cesium-133 atom. This is what determines the time that displays on a computer or cellphone.

These two types of time do not always line up.

In part, that’s because the Earth does not keep perfect time.

Duncan Agnew, a geophysicist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, explains that movements within the Earth’s liquid core can cause the spin rate of the planet to speed up or slow down.

And the U.S. Naval Observatory reports that during the past 40 years, Earth has generally run slow compared with atomic time, an average 1.5 to 2 milliseconds per day.

To keep the two types of time from veering too far away from each other, the IERS calls for a leap second whenever it appears there will be more than a 0.9 second difference between astronomical time and atomic time.

Since 1972, there have been 26 leap seconds added in intervals varying between six months and seven years.

For the record, the IERS could also say that a second should be subtracted from atomic time, but that has never been necessary.

Although it’s no big deal for most of us to adjust to an additional atomic second in our year, it is a much bigger pain for people who run computer networks. In the past, tech companies such as Google, Reddit and LinkedIn have all run into problems because of the addition of a leap second.

Therefore, the future of the leap second is being hotly debated.

The Seattle Times