Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Too late to partition ?

  1. #1
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Penna.
    Posts
    353

    Too late to partition ?

    I have a 40 gig hard drive in my computer that is running XP Pro. When I got the computer I only made one partition the size of the hard drive. Now I would like to partition a section of that hard drive to store a backup of MY DOCUMENTS etc. I have been reading about partitioning , but it seems like you need to do that at the beginning when you are first setting up your computer. Is there a way to make a 10 gig partition now, or is it too late ?

  2. #2
    Old and Cranky Super Moderator rik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Watching Your every move...
    Posts
    4,303
    The only way to partition at this stage would be to use a 3rd party partitioning utility like Partition Magic or the likes...I've personally not used one before so can't recommend one. IMO another hard drive would be your best option.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    60

    Try Ranish Partition manager

    I believe it is an open source project which has become quite polished.

    oops forgot the link http://www.ranish.com/part/
    Last edited by 1badger11; November 22nd, 2004 at 04:10 AM. Reason: Add link

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    12
    Partition Magic can do the task of it.
    But need newer version that support for Windows XP.
    I remember that PM8 or later is work @WinXP.

    Hope that it can solve your problem.

  5. #5
    Hardware guy Super Moderator FastGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Blasters worm farm
    Posts
    3,089
    IMHO before you go buy partition software that you'll hardly ever use, buy another HD and use that as the second partition. Get a big one and move all your backups, pic's, music over even put your swap file on the second HD.

    I see deals all the time for HD's for around $49.00

  6. #6
    Techzonez Governor Super Moderator Conan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    3,920
    Quote Originally Posted by FastGame
    IMHO before you go buy partition software that you'll hardly ever use, buy another HD and use that as the second partition. Get a big one and move all your backups, pic's, music over even put your swap file on the second HD.

    I see deals all the time for HD's for around $49.00
    I agree. 40 gig is pretty small these days, a 2nd hard drive would be ideal.

  7. #7
    Old and Cranky Super Moderator rik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Watching Your every move...
    Posts
    4,303
    I saw a deal yesterday on Outpost.com (Fry's). A Seagate 200 gb drive for 70 bucks after rebate...Look here for details:

    http://www.techzonez.com/forums/show...?t=8822&page=2
    Last edited by rik; November 22nd, 2004 at 14:35 PM.

  8. #8
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Penna.
    Posts
    353
    Thanks everyone---It seems like a second HD is the way to go.

  9. #9
    Succeded in braking Windo TZ Veteran Dehcbad25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    DE - USA
    Posts
    2,222
    I was going to suggest, but I see everyone answered already. Backup in a partition won't offer you much advantage, unless you want to limit the size of the backup. Also, it will create a lot of disk work, since the disk you are reading to the one you are backing up to are the same. Thought you have 2 partitios, it is still one drive. With this task you will have a slow backup, and it will also considerably raise your temperature. Then you might kill your drive
    I personally don't recomend partitioning since you actually split the HD, and in real life, if you partition 40 GB in half, it doesn't mean you still have 40 GB. Because you have to leave empty space for the computer to run smoothly, so before you know it you have 2 partitions that have less than 10% and you can defragment. I Strongly recomend another drive instead of partition the one you have. IF you are up to, buy a bigger, newer, faster drive, transfer all data (probably the drive includes the tool, if not you can download from the manufaturer's web site) and leave the 40GB for the backup
    There is only one reason that I recomend partitioning. If you are going to have absolutely only one drive, like for example in bussiness. Why? C drive is usually the one that gets corrupted and you can't see thru Windows (because the beggining of the drive is more likely to go bad). This happened in my office at least 5 times (We have 100 PCs) So, it is easy enought for me to plug the HD in another computer, pull the files from the D drive (where all users save their files) and then with time I can run recovery software to pull other files from the C if needed, but in the mean time, the user got all important files related to work

  10. #10
    Silver Member joshsiao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    326
    Well, I agree that backing up on another partition on the same hard drive won't make much difference.

    The best is to back-up on DVD-RWs! I love my new writer becasue I can back up all my files easily rather than on many CD-RWs.

    Well, ya 40GB HDDs are the norm now. But I can tell you it is very expensive to get a 80GB HDD from 40GB but it is only a few dollars more from 80GB to 120GB.
    "Never seem more learnt then the people you are with. Wear your learning like a watch and keep it hidden. Do not pull it out to count the hours, but give the time when you are asked."
    ~Chesterfield

  11. #11
    Near Life Experienced TZ Veteran zipp51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,043
    Well for about 2 yrs I have had an 80gb HD partitioned into 3 parts and just recently I had corruption problems that left me with a slooow everything and many window programs that wouldn't start at all including Restore.Reformatted and now have 1 partition.I'm not sure if I will use PM8 again to split the drive up in 3's.My concern is leaving such a large capacity drive whole and having to wait hours for a defrag.Maybe a 3rd party defrag program might speed things up.
    The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

  12. #12
    Succeded in braking Windo TZ Veteran Dehcbad25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    DE - USA
    Posts
    2,222
    humm Zipp, actually you are contradicting with the defrag. Having smaller partitions might take less time per partition (less size) but it actually takes more in the whole. It is a lot slower to defrag a 60 GB drive than 3 20 GB partition. And the difference is a lot bigger when you have more files on the drive. If partition A for example has only 5% available it is not recomended to defrag, but you might have plenty of space in the other partitions

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •