Yes, I wear racing gogglesOriginally Posted by phishhead
Hey hows it going "champ"? guess since your memory is good you won't forget who the Graphics Champ isOriginally Posted by egghead
![]()
![]()
Nice ram Conan, pump the FSB & burn more rubber![]()
Yes, I wear racing gogglesOriginally Posted by phishhead
Hey hows it going "champ"? guess since your memory is good you won't forget who the Graphics Champ isOriginally Posted by egghead
![]()
![]()
Nice ram Conan, pump the FSB & burn more rubber![]()
Last edited by FastGame; March 20th, 2004 at 19:16 PM.
It's not the board that's responsible, it's because your CPU at 2.6 is perfectly synchronized with DDR 400 ram. I'm trying to look for an article about this that I posted before but I can't find it.Originally Posted by egghead
No, you guys are the same 200x4=800fsb. The Intel cpu's are locked, you can only overclock by raising the FSB. When egghead raises his fsb to get his cpu the same mhz as you he's also at a higher fsb than you and thats why his memory score is higher, he's at 250fsb and your at 220fsb. egg's 2.6 should top out at the same mhz as your 3.0 but he will always be at a higher fsb than you providing he has the ram that can do so.Originally Posted by Conan
I read somewhere in the past that 2.4's and 2.6's will easily overclock to 250 FSB while 3.0's and 3.2's won't reach as high FSB numbers. I run into memory errors at 240 FSB. I tried raising ram voltage to 2.85 to no avail. I haven't tried raising CPU voltage though. The CPU also isn't too stable when going upward of 232 FSB, I get reboots while benchmarking.Originally Posted by FastGame
Thats because the 2.4/2.6 have a lower multiplier than the 3.0/3.2 The CPU's run synchronized 1:1 with the fsb. A lower multiplier will give less CPU MHZ at a fixed fsb but if you run all the CPU's at a fixed MHZ then the ones with the lower mulitplier will be at a higher 1:1 fsb.Originally Posted by Conan
A 2.4 has a 12 multiplier for a 1:1 sync @200fsb, 12x250fsb=3000mhz, that seems like a pretty reasonable figure as long as the PCI & AGP busses are designed (locked/adjustible) in some way to operate at 250fsb.
A 3.0 has a 15 mulitiplier for a 1:1 sync @200fsb, 15x250fsb=3750mhz! that seems like it would be hard to do without some serious voltage & cooling.
Anyway Overclocking involves many things other than the multi/fsb, you have the PCI/AGP busses, voltages, memory/fsb divisors and cooling factors to figure in.
My Asus board has a PCI/AGP lock. My crappy MSI board doesn't!Originally Posted by FastGame
![]()
Bookmarks