A defragger does not have to be very good to be better than a windows defragger. -just my opinion.![]()
I also tried the Smart Defrag, almost identical results with the Defraggler.
How can you tell how well a defragger defrags?
- Have a nice day.![]()
I used the vista defrager. It took all day. It never finished. It slowed down my PC a little, I think. I now use Auslogics defragger. It finishes in less than 2 minutes.
When I used XP's defragger, it took 2.5 hours. I used diskeeper and it defragged in about 2 minutes. It acted like it moved every file. It found fragmentation that XP's missed.
Can't speak on Defragger, but Smart Defrag has a couple ways to set it up. One is to start at boot for continuous defragmentation. Another is by schedule. In both cases you can choose which drives to process. I was surprised to see that it not only found all drives on my computer, it also found my network drives.
Linux Mint Debian Edition
I ran SmartDefrag on a fully defraged HD (XP defrager) and SmartDefrag said no fragmented files, moved a couple files around and thats it.
I've used PerfectDisk for years and went back to the XP defrag, don't notice a difference so XP defrag is ok in my book.
You can't, other than the Placebo effect, pick the sugar pill that has your favorite color....
Last edited by FastGame; November 1st, 2008 at 00:56 AM.
Bookmarks